Ever found yourself nodding along when someone talks about a car having “160 horsepower” without really understanding what that means? Don’t worry—you’re not alone.
I mean, think about it. When someone tells you a car is 15 feet long or weighs 3,000 pounds, that makes immediate sense. But 160 horsepower? Are we supposed to imagine 160 actual horses somehow crammed under the hood? And why horses specifically? Did we run out of measurement units and have to resort to animals?
The truth behind this curious unit of measurement goes back centuries and involves an engineering genius who needed to solve a very practical marketing problem.
Table of Contents
Going Back in Time: Before Engines Ruled the World
To understand why we measure engine power using horses, we need to travel back to the 18th century. Before cars, tractors, or trains existed, horses were the backbone of transportation and heavy labor.
One of the most critical jobs horses performed was helping miners remove water from the depths of coal and copper mines. These mines would frequently flood with groundwater and rainwater, making it impossible to work until all that water was pumped out. The solution? Horses pulling large barrels of water to the surface.
During this horse-dependent era, the first attempts at creating mechanical devices powered by steam began to emerge. Thomas Savery made the initial breakthrough with his steam engine, which miners used to lift water from the mine shafts. Unfortunately, Savery’s engine was weak and plagued with problems.
The situation improved somewhat when English inventor Thomas Newcomen created a more powerful engine in 1712. His design could pump more water from greater depths, but it had a major drawback—it guzzled fuel like nobody’s business.
Enter James Watt: The Father of the Modern Steam Engine
Everything changed in 1764 when a Scottish engineer named James Watt entered the picture. Born in Greenock, Scotland in 1763, Watt showed an early talent for fixing tools and gradually taught himself the principles of thermodynamics.
In 1764, Watt became fascinated with Newcomen’s steam engine and decided to tackle its fuel consumption problem. He succeeded brilliantly by adding a new component he called a “condenser,” which dramatically improved the engine’s efficiency while reducing fuel consumption. This became the best steam engine model of its time.
But here’s where things got tricky. Watt needed to convince people to replace their trusted horses with his strange new machine. And honestly, it was a tough sell. Imagine walking up to someone who’d relied on horses their entire life and saying, “Hey, ditch your horses and try this metal contraption instead!”
The Marketing Genius Behind Horsepower
After pondering this challenge for a while, Watt realized something crucial: to convince people, he needed to compare his engine to something they already understood well. And what did they understand better than horses?
So Watt took his personal draft horse to a coal mine and conducted experiments to measure exactly how much weight it could lift, how high, and in what amount of time. After crunching the numbers, he decided this would be his baseline measurement.
He told potential customers: “If an engine can lift the same amount that one horse lifts, in the same time, to the same height, then this engine has the power of one horse.” If the engine could lift twice as much? Two horsepower. Simple and brilliant.
When Watt began selling his engines, he advertised them as having 10 horsepower—and just like that, the concept clicked in people’s minds. This straightforward comparison made the abstract power of his steam engine tangible to 18th-century buyers.
From Local Innovation to Global Standard
Watt wanted to expand beyond his local market, but scaling up required significant capital. He partnered with Matthew Boulton for 25 years, securing the funding needed to improve his engine and promote it widely.
Between 1776 and 1781, Watt personally supervised the engines installed in mines. In 1781, he invented a new system called the “sun and planet gear,” which improved the engine’s quality and rotational efficiency. This innovation allowed him to enter new markets and industries such as corn, barley, and cotton processing.
Gradually, factories began replacing horses with Watt’s new engines. Horses were relegated to riding rather than industrial work, and the mechanical horsepower became the official measurement standard for engine power. As time passed, the term spread worldwide and became the standard unit for nearly all engines.
Was the Horse Really the Best Choice?
You might wonder—was James Watt right to choose the horse as his unit of measurement? Couldn’t he have used a different animal, or even something else entirely?
If we compare horses to other animals, we discover they’re actually uniquely suited for this purpose. On the Watt scale, a horse generates approximately 750 watts of power. A bull, despite being larger and heavier, produces only about 560 watts. Even the “ship of the desert,” the camel, generates just 500 watts.
There’s something special about horses—they combine immense power with speed in a way few other animals do. Plus, they were deeply integrated into people’s daily lives, making them the perfect reference point.
Other animals wouldn’t have worked nearly as well. A shark? Not only was it far removed from people’s everyday experience (making its power difficult to conceptualize), but Watt would have had a hard time strapping a shark to a mill to measure its output! Even powerful birds like eagles couldn’t perform the industrial tasks that horses routinely handled.
An Enduring Legacy
And that’s why, even today in 2025—nearly three centuries after James Watt’s clever marketing solution—we still hear car advertisements boasting about horsepower ratings. This simple, relatable measurement that began as a way to sell steam engines has stood the test of time, outlasting even the widespread use of the animals it references.
Next time someone mentions that a car has 300 horsepower, you’ll know exactly why we’re still comparing our high-tech vehicles to animals from a bygone era. Sometimes the most practical solutions are the ones that endure the longest.
What everyday measurements or expressions do you use without knowing their origins? I’d love to hear your thoughts!
